Head-to-head
Clay vs FullEnrich
Clay: Spreadsheet-style enrichment workspace that waterfalls dozens of data providers per cell. FullEnrich: Waterfall enrichment aggregating 15+ vendors for email and phone.
Overlapping capabilities: Email finding.
Benchmark: people search
Clay and FullEnrich have no completed benchmark run yet — this comparison fills in as suites run. Reviews below are live.
Reviews across the web
Clay is beloved by power users — near-perfect scores on G2 (4.9) and Product Hunt (4.8) driven by its waterfall enrichment and AI research agent — but community sentiment is more divided than the ratings suggest. The recurring complaints are opaque credit economics, surprise billing, and a learning curve that punishes casual users, reflected in a much lower Trustpilot score. It rewards teams willing to invest in learning it and monitoring credit burn.
Full roundup →FullEnrich earns strong buyer-side reviews (4.8 on G2 across ~204 reviews, 4.8 on Product Hunt) for making waterfall enrichment cheap and simple, with users crediting it for finding contacts other tools miss. Sentiment is polarized, though: its Trustpilot score is poor, driven mostly by data-subject privacy complaints rather than customer dissatisfaction. Cost of phone credits is the main buyer-side gripe.
Full roundup →