Head-to-head
Clay vs Lusha
Clay: Spreadsheet-style enrichment workspace that waterfalls dozens of data providers per cell. Lusha: Contact-data platform with browser extension and API access.
Overlapping capabilities: People enrichment, Email finding.
Benchmark: people search
Clay and Lusha have no completed benchmark run yet — this comparison fills in as suites run. Reviews below are live.
Reviews across the web
Clay is beloved by power users — near-perfect scores on G2 (4.9) and Product Hunt (4.8) driven by its waterfall enrichment and AI research agent — but community sentiment is more divided than the ratings suggest. The recurring complaints are opaque credit economics, surprise billing, and a learning curve that punishes casual users, reflected in a much lower Trustpilot score. It rewards teams willing to invest in learning it and monitoring credit burn.
Full roundup →Lusha is one of the most-reviewed tools in the category (4.3 on G2 across ~1,656 reviews, 4.0 on Capterra) with a clear pattern: praised for simplicity and phone-number quality, criticized for mediocre email accuracy, fast credit burn, and billing practices. Sales communities generally treat it as a good dialer-feed that should be paired with other tools, and its auto-renewal terms are the loudest complaint outside product quality.
Full roundup →