Head-to-head
Crustdata vs People Data Labs
Crustdata: Real-time B2B data API covering 200M+ companies and 800M+ people profiles, with live LinkedIn-style screening endpoints. People Data Labs: Dataset-first data provider selling bulk person and company records via search and enrichment APIs.
Overlapping capabilities: Company search, Company enrichment, People search, People enrichment, Email finding.
Benchmark: people search
| Metric | Crustdata | People Data Labs (partial run) |
|---|---|---|
| Precision (of returned) | 79.1% | 100% |
| Precision@10 | 77% | 100% |
| Title fill | 100% | 100% |
| Depth (avg results /25) | 25 | 5 |
| Latency p50 | 7,305ms | 1,715ms |
Bold = better. Partial run = quota hit mid-run; not directly comparable. From the latest run — full report.
Reviews across the web
Crustdata has a sparse but genuinely positive review footprint: a 4.4-star rating from 13 Product Hunt reviews and essentially no G2 or Capterra corpus, reflecting how early-stage the product is. Users who have adopted it praise the developer experience and its real-time webhook alerts as a real differentiator, while the open question in reviews is whether data quality and latency hold up at production scale. Buyers should weight their own bake-off results heavily given the small sample of public reviews.
Full roundup →People Data Labs has a small but favorable review base (4.6 stars from 16 G2 reviews) — modest for its market presence because it sells to developers, not end users. The consistent theme is strong person-level data and good support, offset by staleness and dedup issues at scale and the total absence of a UI or workflow layer. Reviewers commonly advise sampling against your specific titles and regions before committing spend.
Full roundup →