Head-to-head
FullEnrich vs Lusha
FullEnrich: Waterfall enrichment aggregating 15+ vendors for email and phone. Lusha: Contact-data platform with browser extension and API access.
Overlapping capabilities: Email finding, Phone enrichment.
Benchmark: people search
FullEnrich and Lusha have no completed benchmark run yet — this comparison fills in as suites run. Reviews below are live.
Reviews across the web
FullEnrich earns strong buyer-side reviews (4.8 on G2 across ~204 reviews, 4.8 on Product Hunt) for making waterfall enrichment cheap and simple, with users crediting it for finding contacts other tools miss. Sentiment is polarized, though: its Trustpilot score is poor, driven mostly by data-subject privacy complaints rather than customer dissatisfaction. Cost of phone credits is the main buyer-side gripe.
Full roundup →Lusha is one of the most-reviewed tools in the category (4.3 on G2 across ~1,656 reviews, 4.0 on Capterra) with a clear pattern: praised for simplicity and phone-number quality, criticized for mediocre email accuracy, fast credit burn, and billing practices. Sales communities generally treat it as a good dialer-feed that should be paired with other tools, and its auto-renewal terms are the loudest complaint outside product quality.
Full roundup →