Head-to-head
Prospeo vs FullEnrich
Prospeo: Email and mobile finder popular in outbound waterfalls. FullEnrich: Waterfall enrichment aggregating 15+ vendors for email and phone.
Overlapping capabilities: Email finding, Phone enrichment.
Benchmark: people search
Prospeo and FullEnrich have no completed benchmark run yet — this comparison fills in as suites run. Reviews below are live.
Reviews across the web
Prospeo is a newer email finder with a strong G2 profile (4.6 across ~437 reviews) and a reputation for accuracy and low bounce rates, especially on LinkedIn-based workflows. The main friction points in negative reviews are credit consumption on bulk jobs that return few matches, and slow support on billing issues. Note that Prospeo publishes many comparison pages about competitors, so third-party coverage of the space often traces back to its own content.
Full roundup →FullEnrich earns strong buyer-side reviews (4.8 on G2 across ~204 reviews, 4.8 on Product Hunt) for making waterfall enrichment cheap and simple, with users crediting it for finding contacts other tools miss. Sentiment is polarized, though: its Trustpilot score is poor, driven mostly by data-subject privacy complaints rather than customer dissatisfaction. Cost of phone credits is the main buyer-side gripe.
Full roundup →