Provider · people data
Hunter.io
Email finding and verification API built around domain patterns.
Benchmark results
Hunter.io has not completed a benchmark run yet. Suites it qualifies for: Email finding.
What reviewers across the web say
4.5/ 5 · weighted across 1,337 reviews
Hunter.io keeps consistently good scores across G2 (4.4) and Capterra (4.6) and is widely seen as a simple, trustworthy email finder and verifier. The recurring criticism is that it has not kept pace with modern outbound: no phone data, a thin campaigns feature, and mid-pack accuracy in recent community benchmarks. It remains a default pick for straightforward email finding on public web data.
| Platform | Rating | Reviews | Source |
|---|---|---|---|
| G2 | 4.4 / 5 | 634 | g2.com |
| Capterra | 4.6 / 5 | 703 | capterra.com |
What reviewers praise
- Simple, reliable domain search and email finder that has been a category staple for years [1][2]
- Built-in verification catches most invalid addresses before sending [1]
- Rated highly for ease of use across G2 and Capterra (Capterra ease-of-use around 4.8) [1]
- Operates on publicly sourced data with GDPR-conscious practices, reassuring for EU users [1][2]
What reviewers criticize
- No mobile phone numbers, so it cannot serve phone-first outbound teams [1]
- Data quality drops for small companies and fast-growing startups [1]
- One community accuracy benchmark placed Hunter's valid-email rate well below newer finders [1]
- Campaigns feature is basic: text-only emails, no A/B testing, no multichannel sequences [1]
- Some long-time users say recent changes to domain search reduced the volume and quality of results [1]
Aggregated 2026-07 from public review platforms and communities; every claim links to its source. Full review roundup →
Who uses Hunter.io? Evidence-based customer list →