Provider · people data
Lusha
Contact-data platform with browser extension and API access.
Benchmark results
Lusha has not completed a benchmark run yet. Suites it qualifies for: People enrichment, Email finding, Phone enrichment.
What reviewers across the web say
Lusha is one of the most-reviewed tools in the category (4.3 on G2 across ~1,656 reviews, 4.0 on Capterra) with a clear pattern: praised for simplicity and phone-number quality, criticized for mediocre email accuracy, fast credit burn, and billing practices. Sales communities generally treat it as a good dialer-feed that should be paired with other tools, and its auto-renewal terms are the loudest complaint outside product quality.
| Platform | Rating | Reviews | Source |
|---|---|---|---|
| G2 | 4.3 / 5 | 1,656 | g2.com |
| Capterra | 4 / 5 | 398 | capterra.com |
- Email accuracy reported by users around 60-70%, a frequent frustration [1]
- Auto-renewal by default with a support-only cancellation path; surprise renewal charges are a recurring Trustpilot complaint [1][2]
- Credits deplete quickly and there are no refunds for unused time [1][2]
- Weaker coverage outside the US, UK, and Canada, plus stale records in some regions [1][2]
- Privacy and consent complaints (difficulty opting out) dominate its negative Trustpilot reviews [1]
Aggregated 2026-07 from public review platforms and communities; every claim links to its source. Full review roundup →
Who uses Lusha? Evidence-based customer list →